The Snark in your Dreams (low resolution)
Monster Face
Johannes Vermeer & Salvatore Dalí: The Lacemaker
Adriano Orefice: La cerca dello Squallo
The Bellman and Charles Darwin
Hennry Holiday, the Bonnetmaker and a Bonnet
The Ancient of Bad Hair Days
Henry Holiday
The Art of Deniability
The Butcher & the young Raleigh (details)
Blakeekalb
Bellmen on the Rocks
Bellman & Bard
Bellman & Bard
Bellman & Bard after retinex filtering
Bellman & Bard for B&W printing
J. J. Grandville's Monsters
Holidays Boojum
Where do Boojums live?
yimin.tumblr.com
Millais: Study for 'The Boyhood of Raleigh'
How curious are the NPG curators?
Queen Elizabeth I at old age
Mad Tea-Party500500
Mad Tea-Party
Bonnetmaker@ipernity
Hongkong
Entropy Export
Collembolacollaboration
Snark Logo
The Vanishing and the Gneiss Rock
Henry Holiday & John Martin
Nosemorph
皮蛋
臭豆腐
Sharpening at Berkeley
Thomas Cranmer's Burning
Lacing Pillow
M. C. Escher's allusion to John Martin's "The Bard…
Yellow Tape Platform Art
Munich 1900
Springtails at Night
Cartoons, 1981
Southern Californian Factory
The Boojum sitting on some of the 42 boxes
See also...
See more...Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 23 Jun 2013
-
3 256 visits
The Snark in your Dreams


The lower image is the only Snark illustration by Henry Holiday which shows the Snark. However, in this case the beast appeared in The Barrister's dream. Therefore it is just a Dream Snark.
[top]: Detail from the etching (1566-1568) The Image Breakers by Marcus Gheeraerts the Elder.
[bottom]: Detail from the illustration (1876) by Henry Holiday to The Hunting of the Snark. Lewis Carroll (C. L. Dodgson) did not want Henry Holiday to depict the Snark in the illustrations to The Hunting of the Snark. But Holiday was allowed to let it appear veiled by its "gown, bands, and wig" in The Barrister's Dream.
Also in this case, Holiday pictorially alluded to the etching by Marcus Gheeraerts the Elder. In this comparison several shapes - see notes (1) to (5) - provide the beholder of the illustration with pictorial quotes which point to that etching.
This is just the place to repeat a textual quote which I like a lot:
"We have neglected the gift of comprehending things through our senses. Concept is divorced from percept, and thought moves among abstractions. Our eyes have been reduced to instruments with which to identify and to measure; hence we suffer a paucity of ideas that can be expressed in images and in an incapacity to discover meaning in what we see. Naturally we feel lost in the presence of objects that make sense only to undeluted vision, and we seek refuge in the more familiar medium of words. ... The inborn capacity to understand through the eyes has been put to sleep and must be reawakened."
(Rudolf Arnheim: Art and Visual Perception, 1974, p. 1)
Images like this could be used in class by arts teachers to reawaken that inborn capacity. This also is a training to make and discuss decisions based on incomplete information.
Am I wrong? Am I right?
"Only those questions that are in principle undecidable, we can decide."
(Heinz von Foerster: Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics, 1990-10-04, Système et thérapie familiale, Paris)
·
2014-05-19

[top]: Detail from the etching (1566-1568) The Image Breakers by Marcus Gheeraerts the Elder.
[bottom]: Detail from the illustration (1876) by Henry Holiday to The Hunting of the Snark. Lewis Carroll (C. L. Dodgson) did not want Henry Holiday to depict the Snark in the illustrations to The Hunting of the Snark. But Holiday was allowed to let it appear veiled by its "gown, bands, and wig" in The Barrister's Dream.
Also in this case, Holiday pictorially alluded to the etching by Marcus Gheeraerts the Elder. In this comparison several shapes - see notes (1) to (5) - provide the beholder of the illustration with pictorial quotes which point to that etching.
This is just the place to repeat a textual quote which I like a lot:
"We have neglected the gift of comprehending things through our senses. Concept is divorced from percept, and thought moves among abstractions. Our eyes have been reduced to instruments with which to identify and to measure; hence we suffer a paucity of ideas that can be expressed in images and in an incapacity to discover meaning in what we see. Naturally we feel lost in the presence of objects that make sense only to undeluted vision, and we seek refuge in the more familiar medium of words. ... The inborn capacity to understand through the eyes has been put to sleep and must be reawakened."
(Rudolf Arnheim: Art and Visual Perception, 1974, p. 1)
Images like this could be used in class by arts teachers to reawaken that inborn capacity. This also is a training to make and discuss decisions based on incomplete information.
Am I wrong? Am I right?
"Only those questions that are in principle undecidable, we can decide."
(Heinz von Foerster: Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics, 1990-10-04, Système et thérapie familiale, Paris)
·
2014-05-19

- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sign-in to write a comment.