The out-of-focus-areas
Fakery
Learning how not to dry chanterelles
At the Vittorio Emanuele II memorial in Rome
Funicular tunnel
May 8th
Uno studio medico
Venice as the tourist sees it
Lake Como from the castello above Varenna
Tidy folds and poker faces
Her right thumb
The death of a horse (or a weasel) is a feast for…
Icy path
Parts of the flag
No laundry, no leaking
I love selfies -- other people's selfies
Impressed by ritual
First station
Procession between stations
Stations of the Cross, Varenna, Good Friday
Wall of Love Gums
Another view of Venice
In the Cinque Terre
Where I work
Four assistants
End of roll
Gerry by 110
The close-up lens slid in
Autopak does doubles
The Minolta Autopak exposes well but user-failure…
Kit at work
Parking
The train of thought broken by the camera
Skaters
P debriefing
Steps
Dad at 86
Professor and student
Three of my colleagues
Which sparrow have I got?
Cat picture
David and Jim
Warm wind at the dam
Fence
Riders
See also...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
-
39 visits
Pholiota, maybe?


I've been scanning slides I took in the 1990s lately and have come
across several of mushrooms, and I no longer know what they are. I
used to know mushrooms better than I do today, but that doesn't say
much about my former ability to recognise them.
Take these, for example. Maybe they are Pholiota. Maybe not.
This was probably Ektachrome 100SW because I was using a lot of it
around the time, 1997. And it was probably in my Canonet -- but it
could just as likely have been my Nikon FE or my Minolta X370. The
consistent sharpness of this and other pictures on the roll, and the
beautiful out-of-focus areas (not so much in this one) make me think
it was the Nikon.
across several of mushrooms, and I no longer know what they are. I
used to know mushrooms better than I do today, but that doesn't say
much about my former ability to recognise them.
Take these, for example. Maybe they are Pholiota. Maybe not.
This was probably Ektachrome 100SW because I was using a lot of it
around the time, 1997. And it was probably in my Canonet -- but it
could just as likely have been my Nikon FE or my Minolta X370. The
consistent sharpness of this and other pictures on the roll, and the
beautiful out-of-focus areas (not so much in this one) make me think
it was the Nikon.
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sign-in to write a comment.