Zinnias, anyone?
Tall Grass, Gates Road
Geese all in a Row
Cupola
Russell Moore & IIIrd Tyme Out
Sky and Field
Shattered
Kevin Gaugier
Burrage Library
Michael Cleveland and Flamekeeper
It's Raining
Windmills
Poplar
Grayling
Woodpecker
Campsite
Coneflower
Birches
Our Buddy
Zinnias
The Rest Room
Roots
Peter Rowan Bluegrass Band
Spokes
Birds on Tree
Blocks
Home
Waterloo Bucks at Play
Santee Highway Barn
Coneflowers
The Butterfly on the Coneflower
Along the Fence
August
Rock Wall, Canyon Falls
The Upjohn Farm
Joan at Rest
Only the Silo Remains
Three Lakes
Trellis
House & Barn, M-43
Access
Social
The Front Garden
Verbena
Black-Eyed Susan
Location
Lat, Lng:
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
Keywords
Splotchy Revisited


This young cowbird hung around the yard for a while last August. I took to calling him Splotchy.
This is the same photo as last year's 366 Snaps pic, but it's been processed a bit differently. The obvious change is that I've reduced the contrast.
==========
"But it's got a 'been there, done that' feel to it." So I said yesterday, in my comments on a fairly similar photograph. And that's true. But there are reasons--beyond the simple fact that I like having birds in the yard--to make these photographs with this setup.
While my 300 mm prime is certainly a capable lens for many purposes, in my kit its main roles are photographing birds and baseball players. The 80-200 mm I used for this photo works nearly as well for those uses--as this photo shows--but it's far more flexible. I'd never carry the 300 on a beach; I often take the 80-200.
Technically, this is the best lens I own. It's reasonably fast (f2.8 at every focal length), focuses quickly, and doesn't much distort the light. Moreover, it's relatively lightweight for a longer lens. It lacks VR, but I'm pretty good at hand-held--and I use a tripod or monopod when it's appropriate. I bought the lens new at closeout prices when Nikon introduced its replacement, and really haven't regretted owning it.
When I was a young photographer the performance deviations between fixed-length primes and zooms were fairly dramatic. These days there are still differences, but most of us are able to get consistently excellent photographs using modern zooms. I'm happy with the tradeoffs.
As I've mentioned before: All cameras are compromises, and all are compromised. My kit consists of compromises I've decided I can live with. Finding those took years of experimentation, and I've owned quite a few lenses. YMMV, of course, and we should both be happy about that.
==========
I need to point out that I've never considered selling the 300 mm. It, too, serves purposes in my kit.
==========
This photograph is an outtake--actually, a different version of the same photo--from my 2012 photo-a-day project, 366 Snaps.
Number of project photos taken: 56
Title of "roll:" Birds
Other photos taken on 8/5/2012: Joan harvested some pretty beans.
This is the same photo as last year's 366 Snaps pic, but it's been processed a bit differently. The obvious change is that I've reduced the contrast.
==========
"But it's got a 'been there, done that' feel to it." So I said yesterday, in my comments on a fairly similar photograph. And that's true. But there are reasons--beyond the simple fact that I like having birds in the yard--to make these photographs with this setup.
While my 300 mm prime is certainly a capable lens for many purposes, in my kit its main roles are photographing birds and baseball players. The 80-200 mm I used for this photo works nearly as well for those uses--as this photo shows--but it's far more flexible. I'd never carry the 300 on a beach; I often take the 80-200.
Technically, this is the best lens I own. It's reasonably fast (f2.8 at every focal length), focuses quickly, and doesn't much distort the light. Moreover, it's relatively lightweight for a longer lens. It lacks VR, but I'm pretty good at hand-held--and I use a tripod or monopod when it's appropriate. I bought the lens new at closeout prices when Nikon introduced its replacement, and really haven't regretted owning it.
When I was a young photographer the performance deviations between fixed-length primes and zooms were fairly dramatic. These days there are still differences, but most of us are able to get consistently excellent photographs using modern zooms. I'm happy with the tradeoffs.
As I've mentioned before: All cameras are compromises, and all are compromised. My kit consists of compromises I've decided I can live with. Finding those took years of experimentation, and I've owned quite a few lenses. YMMV, of course, and we should both be happy about that.
==========
I need to point out that I've never considered selling the 300 mm. It, too, serves purposes in my kit.
==========
This photograph is an outtake--actually, a different version of the same photo--from my 2012 photo-a-day project, 366 Snaps.
Number of project photos taken: 56
Title of "roll:" Birds
Other photos taken on 8/5/2012: Joan harvested some pretty beans.
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
Sign-in to write a comment.