A little girl's Art
^ ^
Religion explained
Farfalla
Two Tire economy
Art every where
Chopped !
An eye of a tree
Woods
Winter Sunrise
A page -- Nicholas Humphrey's "Soul Dust"
Mummy's pet, is that you....?
The Gregundrum / Figure 2
Time Flow
Pontiac
Do you see violet....?
A farmer
Choice of colours
Fall Leaves
Lucky the leaf.....
EXISTENTIAL ANGST
The Fracture of An Illusion
“It is a beauteous evening, calm and free”
Lawns of Flower Conservatory
Figure 6.2 ~ Penfield homunculus
At Lands' End
Sylva
A photo session by Water Temple
A view across from Water Temple
Just watch -- I'll move it
Sulphrous landscape
Figure 8.4. T-O map, Leipzig, Eleventh century
Figure 12.6 Albert Einstein with Kurt Godel
Thrasymachus's challenge
Ockham’s Razor
From Bowels of Earth
Fun in the sun
Gotcha
Thinking
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
Attribution + non Commercial
- Photo replaced on 02 Nov 2019
-
112 visits
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
But one does not “acquire” a gene, it makes little sense to say that someone has “more” of a gene than someone else, there is probably no such thing as a gene that makes people selfish, and Dawkins never meant that anyway. This distortion is not too surprising. It conforms the popular perception that biology is all about the struggle for survival, Nature red in tooth and claw, the Hobbesian fight of all against all, etc. (that this is in fact largely false in neither here nor there.) So the distortion happened, in this case, because people had a prior notion that the phase “selfish gene” seemed to match. The original explanation (the original meme) was completely ignored, the better to fit that prior conception. ~ Page 38/39
Sign-in to write a comment.