Old Sheldon Church

Large(ish) Format


4x5 isn't as big as you can go, I know, but for now it's plenty big for me.

02 Jun 2013

3 favorites

1 comment

261 visits

Old Sheldon Church

The composition isn't precisely what I'd wanted, since I wasn't anticipating anyone walking into the shot. But I'm awfully glad they did.

28 Aug 2013

3 favorites

419 visits

Wahpihani

I was told that the White River, as it was renamed by, um, White people, got its name from the Delaware Indians who called it "Wahpihani," meaning "Great White River," because of the visible limestone bed beneath much of it. But now, as I try to verify this to write this caption, I see that Michael McCafferty, in "Native American Place Names of Indiana," says this is hooey. Well. It's still lovely.

09 May 2013

4 favorites

270 visits

Silver Snakes

26 Oct 2013

3 favorites

280 visits

As Though Fishing Weren't Relaxing and Peaceful Enough

Here you don't even have to hold up the rod!

26 Jan 2014

1 favorite

291 visits

Vince's Spot

The way pets seek out sunbeams, it just begs for a picture.

Location:
View on map

27 Jan 2014

1 favorite

251 visits

Not a Barn

This *corn crib,* as its owner explained to me, sits off SR13 in Madison County, Indiana, just south of the town of Elwood. I think it is one of the most beautiful buildings in the world.

27 Jan 2014

2 favorites

260 visits

AtTheWater Quasicolor

I could've composed this better, and I definitely lost detail in the highlights on the water, but hey. It was really cold. What I thought was interesting here was that this is just HP5 processed in Rodinal, yet it kind of looks "colorized." The shadows seem to have a bluish cast and the highlights yellow, which wasn't far off from how it actually looked out there the other day.

23 May 2013

2 favorites

1 comment

266 visits

Crabtree Creek, Revisited, Thanks to Clyde Butcher

This was one of my first efforts with the 4x5, and I don't think there's much spectacular here, particularly in terms of the composition. What's more interesting, I think, is why I came back to it. Last week, during a vacation to Florida, I went to a lecture by the photographer Clyde Butcher, whose work I am not alone in admiring. Afterward, he was good enough to sit down and talk with a few of us who'd lined up, and during my turn I gave him a print of this image -- just my awkward way of thanking him for the inspiration he's given me with his black-and-white landscapes of the Everglades. I was naturally embarrassed when he initially had trouble orienting it right -- the way I handed it to him, he must've thought it might be a vertical image instead, which is pretty understandable given the lack of any dominant element (that lack is also the reason I'd previously chosen not to post it here). But after he quickly rotated it into position, he surprised me with an on-the-spot critique! Pointing to the blown highlights on the right, he said "Ooh, that's a no-no, there." Not having expected this, I stammered a bit and apologized, saying that I knew it was far from a perfect print, but that the bright sun streaming in through the branches above was what attracted me to the scene in the first place. "No," he went on, "This is a no-sun shot. You should've waited to take it on a day that wasn't so bright." Now, you (or I) would have to look pretty far and wide to find a more knowledgeable person than Clyde, especially on the topic of accurately metering sunlight on water! But I'm curious whether you agree with his assessment. Is it true that this scene, at that moment was simply not suitable to be photographed? I put a lot of faith in the dynamic range I could extract from my usual 4x5 combination: Ilford HP5+ and stand-processed Rodinal. But, as you (and Clyde) can tell, it wasn't enough. There's no detail in the highlights, and I'm fairly sure I lost the shadows at the other end of the spectrum as well. Should I have just folded the tripod back up and returned another time? In the end, I ask this mostly because I'm curious (and because I want to brag that I got to meet one of my photographic heroes in person). But I'm extra interested to hear any comments, because despite this expert, offhand critique, I expect I'll still continue to find myself drawn to scenes like this -- dramatic streams of light cutting through shadowy wooded areas are a major theme in some of my favorite of Clyde's (and some of your) images! But it's worth, noting, too, that the more meaningful part of my mini-gift to Clyde was actually the note I'd written on the back. And whatever approach I take next, what it said there will remain as true as ever: "The click of the shutter … the glow of the enlarger ... the magic of seeing the image develop in the tray. Thanks for inspiring me to enjoy more of these moments of peace."