Willa B Brown
Ethel Waters
Rose McClendon
Ora Brown Stokes
A. Burrell
Lafayette Reid Mercer
Josephine Baker
Maude Brooks Cotton
Caldonia Fackler "Cal" Johnson
Lucretia ‘Aunt Lou’ Marchbanks
Annie Mae Manigault
First African American Female Disc Jockey in Phill…
Melissa Fuell-Cuther
Florestine Perrault Collins
Mary Peake
A Woman of Many Firsts: Vernie Merze Tate
Mary Davenport
Miss Ruth M. Lowery
Columbus Johnson
Michele Clark
Harriet "Hattie" Redmond
Anna Mac Clarke
Center Market Vendor
J. Steward Davis
Elisa Greenwell
Stone Sisters
William P Newman
Hughes Allison
J.R. Carter
William Craft
Ellen Craft
Dr. Thomas A. Curtis
Lucretia H. Newman Coleman
Florence Mills
Josephine Baker
Ira Aldridge
Alex Manly
Sophia Westfall
Storer College Grads
Sarah Vaughan
Lucy Davis
Williams and Walker "In Dahomey" Company Cast of 1…
Ida Forsyne as 'Topsy'
Josephine Baker
Location
Lat, Lng:
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
You can copy the above to your favourite mapping app.
Address: unknown
See also...
Keywords
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone -
All rights reserved
- Photo replaced on 04 Oct 2016
-
2 400 visits
Reckless Eyeballing: The Matt Ingram Case


Under segregation, a person (of color) could be accused of “reckless eyeballing,” meaning an improper look at a white person, presumed to have sexual intent. Matt Ingram (a black tenant farmer) was convicted of this offense in North Carolina in 1951. [John Zimmerman, photographer (1953)]
Matt Ingram was among the last convicted under this framework, in a 1951 case made notorious by civil rights activists in North Carolina. A seventeen-year-old white woman named Willa Jean Boswell testified that she was scared when her neighbor Ingram looked at her from a distance of about 65 feet. Prosecutors demanded a conviction of assault with intent to rape that was reduced to assault on a female by the judge, leading to a two-year sentence. He was defended by a white lawyer, Ernest Frederick Upchurch, Sr.
At the appeal in Superior Court, the judge instructed the jury that Ingram was guilty if he used “intentional threats or menace of violence such as looking at a person in a leering manner, that is, in some sort of sly or threatening or suggestive manner…he causes another to reasonably apprehend imminent danger” The all-white jury again returned a conviction, leading to a six-month sentence of labor on the roads, suspended for five years.
However, after pressure from the NAACP and African-American media like Ebony, the state supreme court vacated the conviction because: “it cannot be said that a pedestrian may be assaulted by a look, however frightening, from a person riding in an automobile some distance away. …He may have looked with lustful eyes but there was the absence of any overt act.” The look alone no longer represented grounds for conviction. People continued to be convicted of assault if there was “reasonable apprehension” of danger, such as a body movement, movement in the direction of the person under observation and so on.
Ingram spent over two years in prison while his 3 trials took two-and-a-half years to resolve. [State v. Ingram, 74 S.E.2d 532 (N.C. 1953]
Ingram was married to Linwood Jeffress Ingram (1910-2003). The couple had nine children. He died in 1973.
Source: coolcleveland.com
Matt Ingram was among the last convicted under this framework, in a 1951 case made notorious by civil rights activists in North Carolina. A seventeen-year-old white woman named Willa Jean Boswell testified that she was scared when her neighbor Ingram looked at her from a distance of about 65 feet. Prosecutors demanded a conviction of assault with intent to rape that was reduced to assault on a female by the judge, leading to a two-year sentence. He was defended by a white lawyer, Ernest Frederick Upchurch, Sr.
At the appeal in Superior Court, the judge instructed the jury that Ingram was guilty if he used “intentional threats or menace of violence such as looking at a person in a leering manner, that is, in some sort of sly or threatening or suggestive manner…he causes another to reasonably apprehend imminent danger” The all-white jury again returned a conviction, leading to a six-month sentence of labor on the roads, suspended for five years.
However, after pressure from the NAACP and African-American media like Ebony, the state supreme court vacated the conviction because: “it cannot be said that a pedestrian may be assaulted by a look, however frightening, from a person riding in an automobile some distance away. …He may have looked with lustful eyes but there was the absence of any overt act.” The look alone no longer represented grounds for conviction. People continued to be convicted of assault if there was “reasonable apprehension” of danger, such as a body movement, movement in the direction of the person under observation and so on.
Ingram spent over two years in prison while his 3 trials took two-and-a-half years to resolve. [State v. Ingram, 74 S.E.2d 532 (N.C. 1953]
Ingram was married to Linwood Jeffress Ingram (1910-2003). The couple had nine children. He died in 1973.
Source: coolcleveland.com
Boro, B C, , Marta Wojtkowska have particularly liked this photo
- Keyboard shortcuts:
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the comment feeds of this photo
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter