Articles by Treasa Ui Cionaodha
IP on self destruction course:
-
Ticket #29055
I have another question...
This conversation is followed by Léastaff. (2 days ago)…
-
14 Sep 2014
Why have groups
-
I and a Majority of Members of Ipernity want the right to link back to where I saw an image in any…
-
20 Feb 2014
See all articles...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone (public). -
All rights reserved
-
937 visits
Possible deleting of some Groups by Ipernity
In my opinion
Regarding Ipernity’s decision to consider the possibly somewhere in the future to delete groups who use “Optional “text only “ or “text and graphic icons” for commenting purposes and graphic icon’s for invitations to the group because ipernity consider that this as spam. Also importantly keeping in mind that none of the groups concerned ( to the best of my knowledge) do not make it compulsory to use these options and so allows choice’s to members of groups to choose their own individual preferences. In all honestly I feel you can’t ask for fairer then that. Lastly for those who really don’t like any of the above considerations have the option of not joining these groups.
I consider Ipernity to be totally wrong to consider deleting these groups.
Well first I would like to explain that in my opinion their interpretation SPAM is in error.
Spam is best known and described. Below and is the generally accepted understanding of what spam really is.
“Spam is most often considered to be electronic junk mail or junk newsgroup postings. Some people define spam even more generally as any unsolicited email. However, if a long-lost brother finds your email address and sends you a message, this could hardly be called spam, even though it is unsolicited. Real spam is generally email advertising for some product sent to a mailing list or newsgroup.” Spam is also unsolicited emails to con people into various and dubious investment cons.
So there is not relationship to spam in this issue.
Regards Tess.
alert found in Ring of Excellence. www.ipernity.com/group/ringofexcellence/discuss/154191
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
I found the notification of possible clousure by ipernity in Ring Of Excellence
www.ipernity.com/group/ringofexcellence/discuss/154191
Regards Tess
The option suggested by ipernity "to use the "ipernity invite button" to suggest a group that appears off to the right of the image. Does not work for me. When I tried this the only option I have is add to NEW. I have used the search for a group and the message I get is not group found. ( I think this option is available for Admins of groups only but not sure 100% of that ) When they really are there. Do you or anyone have a solution for this delima.
Regards Tess
PS Danyel's idea to allow all members to be admins is a solution but I don't think that is a good way forward. As you could not know who the real admins are. That to me would me unfair because it is they (the real admins) that do all the hard work to moderate their groups. Just my opinion though.
I agree with you regarding personalising comments. .
Just to clarify to my view. I always add personal comments to all images I view and award in addition to using any of the optional choices offered my groups I am a member of.
I always try to specify why a particular image is so good. Example POV DOF Depth of Colour Composition creativity of subject and on and on.
I really appreciate a link back to where an image of mine was viewed by whatever means the commenter chooses.
To emphasize my point with the Ipernity My main issue is how in my opinion they have misinterpretation what "SPAM" really means.
Sign-in to write a comment.