I have been here on ipernity a few months, and have 'dipped my toe in the water', so to speak, and now I am ready to jump in with both feet. I love the community here and believe in everything we are doing.
So I have a few questions that maybe we can talk about, so that we are all clear on this subject and recent developments with Copyrights.
I read in the IMA newsletter this paragraph: "On March 26, 2019, the European Parliament adopted the copyright reform, which had been subject of much controversy until recently. It does not affect ipernity as a non-commercial community in its entirety. Nevertheless, we would like to ask you again not to upload any copyright protected content."
Reference link www.ipernity.com/blog/team/4720614
In reading about the copyright reform, it seems this is much about creators and their commercial works, yes? So I'm wondering if the above paragraph is using the correct words, that it should say instead 'not to upload any commerical content'??
I'm think that you can have copyright protected works that is not commerical. Likewise, we have an option with our images to mark it as All Rights Reserved ... which doesn't mean that it's commercial, yes?
Because I sell my photography on another website, sometimes (like when I was on Flickr) if my works saw an interesting response I might convert it for sale on the art website .. but leave it on Flickr. So in the context of this post, if I did this then I would have to mark here on ipernity those images private to better comply with the copyright reform?
One of the reasons that helped me to decide to participate in the iperinty community is this sentence found in the FAQ: "Artist? We will offer you a great window on the world and tools to protect your creations." Reference Link: www.ipernity.com/help/faq/general#50 So I'm wondering if this sentence still holds true, or needs a tweak?
I don't seek to sell my photography on ipernity, and only share a link to my artwork in the space provided on my About page. I didn't think I was able to do more, but am I? Like post a link to my artist profile on the other site on each picture description (like Flickr allows if you are a pro member)? Again, I am here for the community, but do like to share my work across platforms when allowed.
So what do you know about all this, or do you have any thughts to add?
Thank you for reading,
Frank
frankjcasella.ipernity.com
Every great movement has visionaries
-
I saw this statement on an art website and it got me to thinking ....
"Every great art movemen…
-
25 Apr 2019
Photo Sharing, Following, and Making Contacts
-
Basketball is not exactly at the top of the list for contact sports. However, it is, like all sports…
-
24 Jan 2019
See all articles...
Authorizations, license
-
Visible by: Everyone (public). -
All rights reserved
-
356 visits
ipernity Copyright Protected vs. All Rights Reserved
Questions about our works since the European Parliament adopted the copyright reform
Jump to top
RSS feed- Latest comments - Subscribe to the feed of comments related to this post
- ipernity © 2007-2025
- Help & Contact
|
Club news
|
About ipernity
|
History |
ipernity Club & Prices |
Guide of good conduct
Donate | Group guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use | Statutes | In memoria -
Facebook
Twitter
HaarFager club has replied to Mickey fezFrank J Casella has replied to Mickey fezFrank J Casella has replied to HaarFager clubFrank J Casella has replied to Jenny McIntyre clubHaarFager club has replied to Frank J CasellaThat IMA news flash seem to be a little misleading. What there is supposed to say is that do not infringe copyright by posting someone else's copyright protected images on your documents.
The EU Copyright Directive on the other hand is not just about commercial works. It is about sharing any works that may infringe someone else's copyright on commercial sites.
The main idea of the directive is to make the commercial service providers as responsible on any copyright infringements happening on their web sites. So, if for example I would post an image of some Disney character on my Facebook account, then the new directive could actually make not only me, but also Facebook as quilt on copyright infringement.
This directive is much of the same as was SOPA/PIPA case few years ago:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA
However, because Ipernity is not a commercial service provider, we should have no reason to worry about it (weight on word should).
Frank J Casella has replied to Sami Serola (inactiv… clubSami Serola (inactiv… club has replied to Frank J CasellaAs well as we at ima team manage to understand this rather complex issue, it doesn't concern us as a service provider. But we still wish that all our members respect copyright.
Frank J Casella has replied to Marta Wojtkowska clubMarta Wojtkowska club has replied to Frank J CasellaSix countries (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against it. Three countries (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained. So we lost this battle, but it is not over. Europe is changing.
The next elections to the European Parliament are coming. In May 2019.
Maybe we'll have more votes in the parliament. Maybe we'll manage to get the directive readjusted.
If not, we'll be cunningly inventive when implementing the new law so that it harms people the least. At least in Poland. After we win the next elections here. Coming next October/November.
Sign-in to write a comment.