Three months ago, the administration of the ambassador pictures fell to me. This group is one of the flagships of ipernity, because the pictures in this group are shown to curious visitors from the web when they discover our website and click onto the button: Explore ➽Noteworthy.
At this occasion, the co-admin raingirl, who also is a jury member, asked the important question: "What is a good photo? What makes us vote yes?". Actually, these are two questions. The first is to find out what distinguishes a good photo. The second is about which of the lot of 'good photos' shall be shown to our visitors. After all, any visitor should not be overwhelmed with millions of 'good photos', but only be shown the ones that are particularly worth seeing.
You can well imagine this selection process from the idea of wanting to make an annual calendar with your own pictures for your relatives for next Christmas. Since a standard annual calendar has 12 sheets, you are faced with the task of selecting the 12 particularly worth seeing pictures from your large number of good pictures.
It is the same with the ambassador pictures. How the jury selects the most noteworthy photos is a separate problem. In any case, the basic set for the selection are 'good photos' submitted by the group members. Therefore it might be helpful to reflect on this matter. So let me invite you to discuss the following.
In my opinion there are 5 criteria for photo assessment:
1. Content (the motif as such)
Is it a common motif or a rare one? Does it show a unique subject or situation? Does it arouse my curiosity? Does it widen my horizons?
2. Composition
Is the photo cropped appropriately, or are there too many unimportant elements distracting from the main motif? Does the photo contain irritating elements? Has the shooting position and/or the perspective been well chosen? Is the choice of foreground or background correct? Are there any criteria for picture composition such as golden section, line management, space allocation, contrasts or opposites? Was the appropriate picture format (landscape, portrait, square) chosen?
3. Technical realization
Is the correct sharpness applied to the main motif? Is any blurring intentional or unintentional? Is the depth of field appropriate? Is the photo correctly exposed? Is any overexposure or underexposure a design element? Is any noise in the picture a design element? Is the visible horizon horizontal? Is a conscious colour design (colourful/off-colour, warm/cold/complementary) recognisable? Is there a colour cast? Is the colour saturation appropriate?
4. Lighting & colour
Does the light emphasise the essential elements of the picture? Is the light too harsh or too dull? Does the light emphasise the mood? Was the motif photographed in a suitable lighting situation (foreground light, side light, back light, artificial light, mixed light, diffuse scattered light)? Does the light emphasise the mood?
5. Impact
Does the picture have an emotional impact on the viewer? Does it tell a story or have a message? Is it creative or original? Does the viewing evoke appreciation of the photographic achievement?
If I were to propose a scoring system based on these criteria, I would do so as follows:
0 = Against the rules
Copyright infringement (plagiarism), violations of the law (freedom of panorama, pornography, hatred, violence)
Examples:
© SOUL7, Suspenders © Virtual model, Bea, exposed for you © A M, In the water
Well, these 3 pictures are legally admissible in Europe. But they are a disgrace for the photographer as well as for ipernity. Photographers with a sense of decency wouldn't upload something like this at all.
1 = Insufficient
Major technical shortcomings, meaningless content, no recognisable image design or design that contradicts all aesthetic principles. Not even sufficient for amateur demands.
Examples:
© Christophe Ruelle, DSC00549 © Michiel 2005, Venice 2022 – Spy outfit
2 = Deficient
Elementary deficiencies in the realisation of a barely adequate pictorial idea.
Examples:
© Christophe Ruelle, DSC00663 © Steve Bucknell, Happy New Year!
3 = Just sufficient.
A photo that is in no way satisfying.
Examples:
© Jianliang, Mia aminda nepo © Ramon Hierro, La belleza y el entorno .Burgos
4 = Sufficient
There are approaches in the 5 aspects mentioned above, but they are not satisfactory.
Examples:
© Steve Bucknell, This Way © Frank Wilhelm, BÖ0023300
5 = On average
The performance corresponds to average amateur photographic expectations.
Examples:
© Salientia, Palmenhaus © Paolo Tanino, Il borgo di Boccadasse
6 = Good
The performance is upper mid-range. It's a good amateur photo.
Examples:
© Ralf Markert, Hallstatt... © Patrick Brandy, 620A2705
7 = Splendid
An interesting content was presented with message-enhancing means without technical deficiencies.
Examples:
© Maeluk, Squirrel © Gary Benson (grbenson3 on flickr), Misty Morning Light
8 = Awesome
The photographer's work is to be fully acknowledged. However, slight improvements are conceivable.
Examples:
© Karl Hartwig Schütz, Glück © Karl-Hartig Schütz, Regenfront
9 = Excellent
A picture that delights and is perfectly shot and edited.
Examples:
© Stephan Fey, Brahms Kontor, Hamburg - HFF © Knut Photos, Nads La Sho
10 = Top
Perfect rendition of a technically difficult, inspiring content.
Examples:
© Ralf Markert, Der Schwimmer © Berny, sky power
There are already some discussion contributions in the ambassador group on this topic. However, because of the general importance of this matter, I would like to bring it out into the open so that it can be discussed by all interested members.
Bernhard Westrup (Bergfex)
St. Johann in Tyrol
November 24, 2022
It makes quite clear, with explicit examples, what constitutes differing levels of technical and artistic competence. It works really well fir me. Thank you. Diana
The article is great. It sums up I believe what most of us think makes a noteworthy photo. I can't find anything to add to remove from this well written article with excellent examples. Great job and thank you! William
Gruß Karin
Well, these 3 pictures are legally admissible in Europe. But they are so miserable that they should be deleted sooner rather than later. They are an embarrassment for both the photographer and ipernity.
pictures that are no copyright infringements, no violation of the law, legally admissible should be depeted asap because of embarrassment?
Really?
I encounter thousands of embarrassing moments every single day - should I always carry a Kärcher with me to wipe out these embarrassments?
A somewhat more chilled attitude is advisable.....
Bergfex club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubBut I would like the photographers in question to be so self-responsible that they don't upload such pictures of the poorest standard at all. They damage the image of Ipernity. This is my very personal opinion.
Boarischa Krautmo club has replied to Bergfex clubwww.ipernity.com/blog/lutzp/4643864
Bergfex club has replied to LutzP clubSometimes, one takes an average image as just a record of being there. So many railway or sites of interest images are like this - the "standard" front 3/4 view of a locomotive or a view "photobombed" by another visitor ...
I must admit that some of my images are better classed as failures, but sometimes I've kept them as a record of something, for example a visit by a bird or animal that rarely stays long enough to pose for me and I'm in a hurry to take the image. Or the colour balance / lighting produce a tinted affect, perhaps because a wall or another object is painted with a bright colour like orange and that 'reflects' into my image ...
Bergfex club has replied to StoneRoad2013 clubwo es sich nicht lohnt, der Gruppe beizutreten.
Guten weekend
Nous sommes sur une plateforme photographique, et Ipernity rassemble tous types de photos avec une grande diversité de sujets et de qualité technique. Le niveau et l'intérêt de ces images sont donc inégaux. Mais ce n'est pas grave, IP n'est pas un site professionnel et se destine avant tout aux amateurs.
Et depuis plusieurs années que je suis membre d'IP, je réalise que souvent, la photo n'est qu'un prétexte pour garder un lien social. Moi-même, si je suis toujours sur IP, c'est que j'ai plaisir à échanger avec des amis rencontrés ici et pour certain d'entre-eux, dans la vraie vie.
Même une photo floue, mal cadrée, avec une dominante colorimétrique sera considérée comme "bonne" par son auteur, puisqu'il la partage. Surtout si pour lui, elle comporte une charge émotionnelle lié à un souvenir ou à un être cher. Elle doit être "excellente" pour beaucoup de membres, si j'en crois le nombre d'étoiles accordées à ces images que je considère médiocres de mon point de vue de passionné de photographie. Mais sur le fond, je me refuse à juger ce qui est du registre de l'intime. Je me contente de ne pas mettre d'étoile.
En revanche, il m'arrive de mettre des étoiles à des photos que je considère "moyennes" car je trouve que l'auteur est en progrès. Alors que je n'en mets pas toujours à des membres plus expérimentés car je trouve qu'ils sont capables de faire beaucoup mieux. Dans ces cas précis, je mets un petit commentaire pour expliquer ce qui ne va pas et ce qui pourrait être amélioré. Ce qui m'a parfois valu des remarques désobligeantes de certains qui n'admettent pas la moindre remarque. J'ai eu un exemple encore assez récemment. Mes remarques sont généralement bienveillantes et se veulent constructives.
A contrario, il y a des membres qui acceptent et demandent des conseils. Ceux là ont bien progressé depuis que je les connais.
Certains font des critiques sur certaines de mes photos. Je suis d'accord ou pas, mais jamais je ne m'en offusque. Ça permet d'engager un débat souvent très intéressant et constructif qui alimente la réflexion.
Alors oui, une bonne photo doit être techniquement et composée de façon irréprochable, le sujet doit être intéressant et lisible au premier coup d'oeil (même s'il y a des exceptions à cette lisibilité immédiate pour des plans très larges avec une multitude de choses à voir)...
Ça c'est dans l'absolu. Et la tentative de classification faite par Bernard à le mérite de donner quelques outils concret pour bien utiliser et comprendre IP.
Bergfex club has replied to Jean-luc DrouinLes raisons d'être actif ici sont donc très variées. Les visiteurs du web qui explorent notre plateforme pour la première fois devraient pouvoir s'en rendre compte. C'est pourquoi nous pouvons être reconnaissants à Arlequin Photography d'avoir toujours tenu à ce que les images des ambassadeurs ne soient pas une collection des meilleures images, mais des plus dignes d'être vues.
Nous, membres du jury, tenterons dans une prochaine étape de définir ce que l'on pourrait entendre par là. Ce ne sera pas facile. Mais si nous nous inspirons de la maxime "La beauté est dans l'œil de celui qui regarde", mentionnée à plusieurs reprises, nous devrions y parvenir.
Bernhard on the other hand gives objective criterias which we can use...................also important
Both togheter................... voilà freedom of expression:)
Thanks anyway to all for the effort about thinking on it.
All the best
raingirl club has replied to Annemarie clubAber eigentlich sollte es gar nicht nötig sein, etwas so Komplexes erklären zu müssen.
Das Auswählen eines "Meister"-Fotos wird immer ein subjektiver Prozess der Juroren sein.
Diese haben die Kriterien -wie sie aufgezählt wurden- ja ohnedies verinnerlicht (hoffe ich :-).
Jeder Normalbeobachter hat dann meist seinen eigenen sehr persönlichen Maßstab. Den kann man aber auch immer noch optimieren. Dafür ist der Artikel sicher hilfreich .
What do you think about this?
Tanja - Loughcrew club has replied to Bergfex clubWarum? Weil mir die Szene genau das in Sekundenbruchteilen „mitgeteilt“ hat und mir dann leider fast egal ist, ob man es besser oder schlechter hätte machen können…vielleicht hattest Du ja nur diesen einen Augenblick? :)
Boarischa Krautmo club has replied to Bergfex clubAber das Motiv: genial.
Das Video: besser nicht zeigen, wackelt zu sehr, Fühler abgeschnitten, Kamerafahrt ist unruhig - da reißt es auch das Motiv nicht mehr raus....
Bergfex club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubWenn das Wetter die nächsten Tage so trüb bleibt, mach ich mir vielleicht die Mühe und greife mal in mein Werkzeugkiste . . .
Boarischa Krautmo club has replied to Bergfex clubRuesterstaude club has replied to Bergfex clubBergfex club has addedraingirl club has replied to Bergfex clubIf this image was cropped from the sides making the 'V' shape at the bottom, the part that has the tiny bit of green, become more noticable connecting with the almost 'V' shape of the tentacles on the snails, and at the same time that cropping would remove distractions from the most fascinating part of the image, the touching points of the snails, then I would probably find it to be a photo I would think about more than once.
I did notice a different image in the video that if done as a still I would probably consider for a longer time. It had a different type cropping to the scene than I describe above.
(I'm sorry if this isn't the type of comment you were looking for by asking "What do you think about this? - but I thought it might be.)
raingirl club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubraingirl club has replied to Bergfex clubla tienne est superbe.. tu as eu de la chance de rencontrer ce type de scène
merci de l'avoir partagé ⭐⭐
Bergfex club has replied to ROL/Photo clubBergfex club has replied to ©UdoSm clubraingirl club has replied to cammino clubBoarischa Krautmo club has replied to Karl Hartwig Schütz clubBergfex club has replied to Karl Hartwig Schütz clubMeiner war:
Beipiele (7): Zwei sehr schöne Abbildungen. Das Besondere an dem Tierfoto ist der direkte Blick des Hörnchens in die Kamera. Dadurch entsteht ein gewisser emotionaler Kontakt zum Betrachter. Im Landschaftsbild schwingt ebenfalls eine gewisse Emotionalität mit, erzeugt durch die besondere Lichtstimmung.
Beispiele (8): Diese beiden Bilder sind mehr als gute Abbildungen. Sie erzählen Geschichten. Das hebt sie meines Erachtens eine Stufe höher.
Bergfex club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubWarum habe ich diese Einstufung vorgenommen?
Ein Sportfoto wie in (10 links) so punktgenau hinzubekommen, ist eine wirklich außergewöhnliche fotografische Leistung. Wir Normalbürger bekommen so was eigentlich nie vor die Linse, geschweige dass wir den richtigen Moment erwischen, den Auslöser zu drücken. Glückliche Mütter mit Kindern zu fotografieren, ist hingegen eine wesentlich einfachere Übung.
Ebenso schätze ich die beiden Schlechtwetterfotos im Vergleich ein. Dass man als Fotograf bei Regenwetter draußen ist, und dann noch so ein Motiv erwischt, wie die beiden Frauen unterm Regenschirm, ist schon genial. Aber dass es einem gelingt, die Urgewalt eines Gewitters so einzufangen wie in (10 rechts), mit dieser Kulisse und solch ausgewogener Bildkomposition ist seltener als ein 6er im Lotto.
Und, wie gesagt: Das ist nur mein persönlicher Maßstab.
Boarischa Krautmo club has replied to Bergfex clubRuesterstaude club has replied to Bergfex clubBergfex club has replied to Rafael clubBy the way, here is the new slide show:
raingirl club has replied to Rafael clubBonne dimanche.
www.ipernity.com/blog/lutzp/4643864/comment/65649346#comment65649346
raingirl club has replied to Boarischa Krautmo clubIt's one of the delights here on ipernity, that the sharing or our photos brings friendships and helpful connections. "ultimately not to be alone"
To get a score of 6, 7 or 8 may be the province of a gifted amateur, probably with a good lens and a good eye too. To get a score of 9 would be a dream of mine, and to get a score of 10 is beyond my capabilities and my camera too..
Nevertheless, we have to try to capture the moment of time or place and a subject that appeals to us personally, and I think the majority of folks on Ipernity do that. It is largely subjective mind you, and a few of my own photos which I really love remain on the site with very few stars. We strive to gain perfection, but photography and carrying a camera is such an enjoyable hobby, so whatever the score, except for 0, 1, 2 and 3 , let's all enjoy living the experience.
raingirl club has replied to DeliriumPhotography, being a relatively concrete medium compared to those two, has even better hit and miss ratio. But as we see on this thread, it is still a mess! Take the cultural background, for example. Us Finns are reserved folks who like silence, solitude and scarcity, which reflects in our art as 'Nordic simplicity' of form and color – which the southeners find simply boring!
Bergfex club has replied to SpoOr, to ask concretely right away. Could you imagine serving on the jury for a while? With the help of Poll Unit, which we introduced as a tool in September, it's pretty light work. The time rhythm (4-weekly) is also not very stressful. What do you think?
Guydel club has replied to SpoI thank all those who contributed to the discussion. This has made it even clearer what the jury has to consider above all when selecting the ambassador pictures: "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." In this context, cultural differences are not to be neglected.
As a next step, I will draw up a catalogue of selection recommendations with the jury.
Für Menschen die mit der Natur eng verbunden sind, so wie ich, auf jeden Fall ein Genuß.
Bergfex club has replied to Heide clubSign-in to write a comment.